+1
An old GSR and an old GSX are gonna be in the same condition mechanically speaking. That many years of VTEC and that many years of Turbo should have really taxed the motor. Look for the one that has the least miles but IMO a DA will be in better condition than a DSM due to the overall quality of Honda over mitsubishi.
Ok this is retarted, just because a car is turbo'd doesn't mean it's putting anymore stress on the motor than a non-turbo, and since when the hell the does vtec put more strain on the motor, please I would love an explanation. A motor is either built good or it isn't, both companies built good motors back then, mitsus didn't naturally have problems, they had problems because people would boost the shit out of them without any other work or tuning. They actually hold together fairly well, I think dc2GS-R would agree.
Also buying a car with low miles doesn't always mean your getting a good deal. You can get a car with 200k plus miles on it and it can be in better shape than the one with 80k. When you buy a car you look at who owns/owned it, you check for maintenence records and you inpspect or have it inspected if you don't know what your looking for. Check for routine maintenace like timing belt, water pump, brakes, oil changes whatever, a good owner of a well maintained car will have records for everything. And to say that Honda is better quality than Mitsubishi is like saying that Ford is better quality than Chevy. Once again back then they were both great companies producing very well built vehicles.
If want to buy a car that you like you drive it, drive both, drive more than both. Compare them, see which one you feel better in. Don't compare a modded Talon/Eclipse to a stock Integra or vice versa because thats not fair, but go and find well taken care of, almost stock vehicles and see which one you like better because they're both good cars and if taken care of will both be just as reliable as the other.