Best Motor for Forced Induction

Death-the-Kid

anta honma ni shinude
You can make 260hp in LS motor easy with turbo. Just get ARP head studs and a decent turbo kit and call it a day.
Apparently he rebuilt an ls with factory parts and was impressed it made 260whp with a turbo. well below the factory threshold for power. I like how you can make 300whp comfortably with the bottom end yet "it want made to make power with a vtec head" according to him.


-i'm not butt hurt you just have no idea what you're talking about. i've shown an actual dynograph and 3rd party results. you've shown a lack of knowledge and that you like the taste of your own foot.

-I don't understand compression? i was the one who had to educate you on what compression does. then you make statements like "gsr cams are too aggressive for the ls bottom end" "or the ls bottom end was made to make power with a vtec head" you magazine forum tuner. where are pics of this big time engine build you are doing btw?


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:

covert_Con

Senior Ricer
Apparently he built an ls to withstand what the factory parts could already do. I like how you can make 300whp comfortably with the bottom end yet "it want made to make power with a vtec head" according to him.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
My friend had that setup and hers made 265whp. low 10s after being gutted and 3" turbo exhaust.
 

Death-the-Kid

anta honma ni shinude
Again, WHY DO I NEED TO JUSTIFY AN OPINION IN THE FIRST PLACE?


Even if it does make more power sooner, it's so very insignificant. If it were worthwhile everybody and their brother would be tossing the GSR bottom end out for an LS block.


You haven't disproven a thing. You posted a built motor's dyno, which has no merit when referring to stock parts. Even so, the dyno you posted, although close, still made less power then a full on counterpart. Decent torque curve? Still has no bearing when I'm not trying to say anything about power curves at all.

What was yours 180/133? Bone stock ITR, making more power and torque than your "LSV."191whp/140tq

Build the head and throw in cams like your motor, and I bet you it would be even further off.
Never once did I say either of these. YOU'RE spreading misinformation by saying that. I simply said my opinion was that it was half assed. My OPINION. I never once said "It's wrong" or "Stop Using it." Where the f*** are you getting THAT one? For someone who keeps talking about misinformation you sure do make up a lot of crap. And simply because you dislike the guy, does not disprove what he said. You tried saying he was telling people that the B16 was better than the GSR motor.. which he never said, and I pointed out with quotes, not quotes taken out of context and what you assumed they meant. Hahaha. :roll:


It wasn't built, the only modification to it was ARP head studs- the point was that little old me rebuilt the motor myself. But I know how you blow things out of proportion so I thought I would mention it.


$300 for the kit to actually bolt the head to your bottom end.
http://passwordjdm.com/Golden-Eagle-B-Series-LSVTEC-Conversion-Kit-P3593C581.aspx
$65 for rod bolts, another $120 for head studs, $500 there. Another $100 to mill the head, deck possibly too might need decked you're at $600 just slapping a stock head on- keeping your old bearings, rings, ect.



I have yet to see a LSV's max power more of that of a GSR. (I'm speaking generally, both being built to the teeth.)

LOL. Oh look, a GSR bottom end. -_-

You see how posting up built motors does you no good? We're not talking of built motors.


Lmfao, Butt hurt much? You didn't really educate me on anything yet.. and because you seem to be missing the concept of compression when talking about LS/V. Why do you think so many people upgrade pistons when building them?


You will see the motor as well as a full list of specs soon. I'll be making a well documented build thread soon enough. A few members here have already seen the motor in person. :roll:


From your buddy Jeff Evans himself..

LS/V: 165whp/124tq
LS/VTEC b16a head conversion
b17a cams
itr intake manifold
usdm itr exhaust manifold


GSR: 171whp/138tq

Edelbrock Performer X Intake Manifold


ITR: 186whp/136tq

AEBS intake manifold


(All had 2.5" exhausts.)

There you go, nearly stock GSR and ITR against a stock-ish LS/V. Having trouble finding completely stock motors, nobody really tunes a stock motor... To be fair I did find a LS/V making 192whp/148tq..... with a 12:1 compression, lol. :roll:

Does that satisfy you? I justified my opinion.
I know i'm not supposed to feed the trolls, but I can't help it sometimes. :thumbs up[/QUOTE]

that itr was even said in the article to be a factory freak to be making that kind of power with a straight through exhaust and no adjustments other than tuning.
This output was unbelievable for a bone stock honda engine with no internal engine work, cam gear adjustments, etc. Only mods were intake, exhaust and NepTune (Current Recommendation: Hondata S300). Much more midrange gains would be realized, as well as more peak power output with cam gear adjustments.
http://www.evans-tuning.com/dynos/2010/11/crx-bone-stock-jdm-itr-swap-191whp140tq/

that is by no means the norm and is an outlier can't base every engine off of that one particular one. how many itr's do you see making that kind of power with those mods? seriously that's k20 level of response. that's 220 flywheel hp + even the modified itr you posted down the sheet didn't make that kind of power with aftermarket cams and built head.


-lol our definition of a "built" motor varies greatly. Obviously you can't just bolt the head onto the block. it takes work. It's not a "half-assed" procedure. and only a fool would pay that much. the kit is $240 not $300. only a moron would pay password jdm's inflated prices. http://www.robearracing.com/pd-golden-eagle-vtec-full-conversion-kit-lsb20-vtec.cfm .$1000 into your b18b is still cheaper than buying a used unknown mileage $2000-2500 dollar stock gsr. again what's your point.

-congrats on rebuilding a stock ls to factory specs. nobody has ever done that before. it sounds really complicated. and then you put a turbo on it and boosted it to well below the factory hp limit on stock internals. do you want a cookie? According to you the ls bottom end wasn't meant to make power with a vtec head yet it can make power with a turbo? how does that even make sense?

-you really don't listen. i just said there is no such thing as a stockish lsvtec since they have 3 different combinations of heads with 3 different results. the b16 being the worst. I've said this 3 times now and you went and found an lsvtec with a b16 head.... that itr is running the same manifold as i am and he has pro 1 cams he makes 6 more whp than me and i have a stock rotating assembly save for rod bolts and my compression ratio is in the 9's. that is why i used it as an example. again please do no speak on topics you have absolutely no knowledge on.


-i don't understand compression? i had to explain/ teach it to you. especially when you make remarks about how the gsr cams are too much for the ls bottom end's compression ratio?

-feeding the troll? you make ignorant statements and proceed to display that you have no idea what you're talking about and i'm the troll? i've provided you with "real world" examples and proof and you do a google query for an outdated article written by people advocating b16's over lsvtecs. I even said that article was written at a time before they even had things like the golden eagle kits. I even said i knew the people in the article for years. it has nothing to do with whether i like them or not. they simply do no know what they are talking about. rod/stroke ratio? you'll be hard pressed to take your factory internals to an rpm where you actually have to worry about it lsvtec or not. it's null and void. "i've ridden in a b16 with skunk2 parts and it was fast" lol right... that guy was/is a tool.

-if you had read you would've seen that what i had said was..if you already have a gsr engine it's not worth it to swap to an ls block when you can build what you have, but if you have a b18b block it's plenty worthwhile to just build that into a vtec engine since a clean gsr swap with tranny typically goes for $2200-2500 and that's only at 140-145whp. again you have no idea what you're talking about.

- your dyno's have only proven what i have said earlier. you don't know what you're talking about. i gave you my dyno and what's done to my engine as proof. how is it half assed when it makes similar power to an equally modified ITR? go back to your magazines bro.
 


Last edited:

Prozon

Kris
You can make 260hp in LS motor easy with turbo. Just get ARP head studs and a decent turbo kit and call it a day.
That's exactly what I did, except for the refresher. No sense boosting a tired motor. :thumbs up

I'm sure we all feel this way alot:
Hahah, did you see that one on my Facebook?

You say that my dyno's have only proved what you said.. yet they have pretty much proven every point I made.. and then you go off by saying "Oh that dyno graph doesn't count."

Well i'm sorry sir, but I just gave you real world data. Just because it doesn't help you on your end of the arguement does not mean I can't use it to justify my opinion. My opinion was based on things like this. Bottom line, you wanted to know why I thought LS/VTEC was half assed. That's why- I told you why, you wanted proof, I gave you dyno graphs and that apparently wasn't good enough. I see no reason to try to convince you further. So, you know.. have a nice day. :roll:

According to you the ls bottom end wasn't meant to make power with a vtec head yet it can make power with a turbo? how does that even make sense?
That has to be the dumbest thing you have ever said. You're comparing forced induction to vtec... seriously?

 


da9 b20 beast

New Member
so far to me it sounds like your repeating the same s***
that ls/v ( a bottom that was never designed for that head) is better than a bottom that was designed for the vtec head...so to me it sounds like if your saying ...my pony can pull more weight than your mule because i gave it bigger saddle....


sound pretty butt hurt to me

 
Last edited:

Death-the-Kid

anta honma ni shinude
so far to me it sounds like your repeating the same s***
that ls/v ( a bottom that was never designed for that head) is better than a bottom that was designed for the vtec head...so to me it sounds like if your saying ...my pony can pull more weight than your mule because i gave it bigger saddle....


sound pretty butt hurt to me

No. I'm saying its has its benefits and to say the setup in general is half assed is just retarded. Nothing butt hurt or stupid about correcting moronic statements in an advice thread. you guys act like the vtec engine bottom end is magically stronger than the ls bottom end. just upgrade your rod bolts and you'll be revving comfortably. my bottom end is stock save for rod bolts and supports 9300rpms all day long. i'm at 60K miles with no oil burning, rod knock or bearing issues.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:

Death-the-Kid

anta honma ni shinude
That's exactly what I did, except for the refresher. No sense boosting a tired motor. :thumbs up


Hahah, did you see that one on my Facebook?

You say that my dyno's have only proved what you said.. yet they have pretty much proven every point I made.. and then you go off by saying "Oh that dyno graph doesn't count."

Well i'm sorry sir, but I just gave you real world data. Just because it doesn't help you on your end of the arguement does not mean I can't use it to justify my opinion. My opinion was based on things like this. Bottom line, you wanted to know why I thought LS/VTEC was half assed. That's why- I told you why, you wanted proof, I gave you dyno graphs and that apparently wasn't good enough. I see no reason to try to convince you further. So, you know.. have a nice day. :roll:


That has to be the dumbest thing you have ever said. You're comparing forced induction to vtec... seriously?

LOL? You and I both know that motor was a freak example. Your 2nd dyno proves it along with every other dyno on that site. If you do the math, that car is putting out numbers it shouldn't be. 30+whp gain with only an exhaust intake and tune? Even he was surprised LOL.

And yes I'm comparing it to forced induction. How can a bottom end you claim not capable to handle a simple head swap capable to withstand the stresses of making over 100more whp with forced induction?

And yes you needed to be educated on compression quite a few times in this thread.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:

Prozon

Kris
You did no "educating" on any of the matters. You say things like "LOL do I need to explain how a cam works?" and then say how you schooled me on the subject. You disregard any facts brought up and just goes with what works. More power to you. I'll let you believe what you want though, lol.
 

Death-the-Kid

anta honma ni shinude
You did no "educating" on any of the matters. You say things like "LOL do I need to explain how a cam works?" and then say how you schooled me on the subject. You disregard any facts brought up and just goes with what works. More power to you. I'll let you believe what you want though, lol.
because apparently you think revving higher is what makes your motor make more power.... in which case i had to explain to you that that isn't the case. i had to explain that certain cams are designed to make power at certain places and in some cases require additional compression to see the full benefits. there is no doubt in my mind that i would make more power with more compression since i'm a little over-cammed. which i am now stating for the 3rd time. you don't believe me then talk to Derek he can dispel a lot of the myths that are still floating around about hondas. His screen name is "ALL MOTOR" here. he even builds custom cams.

My original statements intent was when you said "lsvtec was half-assed" was that my engine is not "built" just springs and retainers to support more aggressive cams and i'm making similar power to your average equally modified itr and i even have lower compression. your 186whp dyno proves that is about the average hp you will make with those mods on an itr. The190whp dyno you showed was well outside of the norm. even evans was surprised himself because of it . my motor is not outside of the norm for lsvtecs with said mods. the reason you see so many slow lsvtecs is because they typically use b16 heads because they're cheaper even though they produce lower results. the b16 head doesn't give you the compression bump that the gsr head does and the cams in it suck balls. even b16's see power gains by simply swapping in gsr cams. It's been real but i'm done going back and forth of this.
 
Last edited:
Top