See i think just the opposite. I mean the C-West uses alot more angles in the front and the JDM teg just doesnt have sharp angles like that. Actually the JDM teg is more boxy than anything else. Thats why the more boxy #1 works better.g3teg97 said:The lines on the C-West bumper look better than the other. Not sure what the other is actually called though. The C-West looks a lot better on a JDM front end than a USDM front end.
I see what you mean. But it doesnt stick out to far on the sides (where it could look bad) just sticks out in the front. I actually like how it comes out in the front. That white car(3rd down) has it JUST right with that kit. Actually the first one is basically a exaggerated JDM ITR bumperg3teg97 said:The problem I have with the first one is that the bottom part, near where the lip would be it too bulky and to sqaure. I understand the JDM front doesn't have as many curves as the USDM front. The sides also make the fronts look better.
LOL, im not a big JDM fan. If it was me id have a 94-97 front with ITR lip, OEM optional sides and 98+ rear bumper with valences. UMMM. now thats SEX! But anyways.... back on topic. I say #1g3teg97 said:Honestly, I wouldn't go with a bumper. I'd stay OE and then just get the ITR lip or the Aztec lip.
Yea ive never seen that kit before you posted it. Oh and I added a POLL for yaSOLOTR95 said:See But I Want Something I Dont Really See To Much Of. And Im Leaning Toward The Rando Kit Cause I Havent Seen It At All Till Just The Other Day Online.